Posts

When the Apostles and Paul Disagree: Ethics, Truth, and the Early Church

When the Apostles and Paul Disagree: Ethics, Truth, and the Early Church One of the most striking aspects of early Christianity is the apparent divergence between the ethical teachings of Jesus and the Twelve apostles, and the later practices and reasoning of Paul. This isn’t just an academic observation; it gets to the core of how early Christianity evolved, and it raises serious questions about moral consistency, authority, and the nature of divine guidance. The Apostolic Ethic: Absolute and Deontological The earliest apostles, following Jesus, operated under a clear moral framework: Obedience and integrity above all: Acts 5:29 says, “We must obey God rather than men,” reflecting the early church’s commitment to act rightly even under pressure. Truthfulness in practice: Peter and John, for example, refused to stop preaching when commanded by authorities (Acts 4:18–20), even at the risk of imprisonment. Simplicity and honesty: The early Jerusalem community shared goods openly and avoi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Slaughtering the Sacred: Faith, Fear, and the Passover Lamb

Slaughtering the Sacred: Faith, Fear, and the Passover Lamb The story of the Exodus is more than a national liberation narrative; it is a story of faith confronting cultural power, of God asserting authority in a world steeped in other religious traditions. In particular, the events of Exodus 8 and 12 show that Israel’s sacrificial lamb was not just a meal, but a theological act of defiance in the face of a life-threatening cultural taboo. To understand the stakes, we must consider how ancient Egyptians viewed rams and lambs. Several major deities were closely associated with these animals. Amun-Ra, one of the king of gods, was often depicted with ram heads or horns, and hymns described him as the creator of all animals, including sheep and goats. Banebdjedet, the ram of Mendes, represented the ba, or divine essence, of Osiris and was worshiped as a living embodiment of God. Temple inscriptions and priestly texts confirm that rams were considered sacred and tied to divine presence and ...
Post a Comment
Read more

20 Internal Inconsistencies Between Acts and Paul’s Letters

  20 Internal Inconsistencies Between Acts and Paul’s Letters The New Testament, while largely harmonious in its theological vision, sometimes presents internal tensions, particularly between the Book of Acts and Paul’s own letters. Acts, written by Luke, often narrates events differently from Paul’s autobiographical epistles, giving scholars and readers a lot to think about. Here are 20 notable inconsistencies that stand out: 1. Paul’s Conversion Timeline Acts 9, 22, 26: Paul’s conversion occurs dramatically on the road to Damascus, with Ananias visiting him immediately afterward. Acts implies a quick turnaround from blindness to ministry. Galatians 1:15–18: Paul describes waiting three years before going to Jerusalem after his calling. 2. Meeting Peter in Jerusalem Acts 9:26–28: Paul meets the apostles immediately in Jerusalem and begins preaching. Galatians 1:18: Paul states he visited Peter (Cephas) three years after his conversion, suggesting Acts compresses or rearranges the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Peter Passing the Baton: How Luke Tries to Legitimize Paul

  Peter Passing the Baton: How Luke Tries to Legitimize Paul When we read Acts carefully, a pattern emerges: the first half centers on Peter and Jerusalem, the second half on Paul and the Gentile mission. Seen closely, Luke isn’t just telling history—he is shaping a narrative to legitimize Paul. By mirroring Peter’s actions, Luke effectively passes the baton, making Paul appear as Peter’s natural successor in spreading the gospel beyond Israel. In Acts 1–12, Peter dominates. He preaches at Pentecost, heals the lame, raises Tabitha, and faces Jewish authorities. Everything emphasizes a Jewish-centered mission and continuity with Israel: the temple, the Torah, the synagogues. Then Luke begins to shift. Paul enters, and suddenly the same patterns—miracles, healings, raising the dead, preaching in synagogues—are mirrored in Paul’s ministry among Gentiles. Lystra recalls the lame man at the temple; Eutychus recalls Tabitha; Paul’s handkerchiefs echo Peter’s “shadow” miracles. Luke’s nar...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why Gentiles Visit Jesus—Not Jews—at the Manger: A Literary Analysis of Matthew’s Nativity Story

Why Gentiles Visit Jesus—Not Jews—at the Manger: A Literary Analysis of Matthew’s Nativity Story The familiar image of “wise men from the East” kneeling before the newborn Jesus is one of the most iconic scenes in Christian tradition. But when the New Testament texts are read closely—and placed within the wider ancient world—something surprising happens. In Matthew’s account, the only people who recognize and honor the child are Gentiles—foreign astrologer-priests—while Jewish religious leaders remain absent. This is not an accident or a forgotten detail. It is a deliberate literary choice, and when read through a historical lens, it reveals much about the author’s agenda, the politics of his time, and the storytelling conventions of antiquity. 1. Matthew’s Nativity Story Stands Alone The Magi appear only in the Gospel of Matthew. Luke, by contrast, has shepherds—local Jewish peasants embedded in Israel’s social world. Matthew introduces Persian or Babylonian ritual specialists who rea...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Case for the Book of Enoch

   A Case for the Book of Enoch  The Book of 1 Enoch occupies an unusual and often misunderstood position in the history of Judaism and Christianity. Although it lies outside most modern biblical canons, it was quoted, preserved, and treated with a level of seriousness that very few non-canonical texts ever achieved. When approached historically rather than devotionally, the evidence suggests that 1 Enoch held scriptural authority in certain ancient Jewish and Christian communities—sometimes more clearly than books that later became canonical. The New Testament itself offers the most striking evidence. Unlike other Second Temple Jewish writings that are merely echoed or alluded to, 1 Enoch is explicitly cited as prophecy. In Jude 14–15, the author writes, “Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying…,” before quoting a passage that corresponds directly to 1 Enoch. This framing is unique. The New Testament never introduces the Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach, Tobit, or the ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Erased Women of Early Christianity: How Female Leaders Were Written Out of Church History

E rased Women of Early Christianity: How Female Leaders Were Written Out of Church History Modern Christianity often claims that women were never bishops, priests, apostles, or authoritative teachers in the early church. This claim is not supported by history. Instead, it reflects later theological restrictions retroactively imposed on an earlier, more diverse reality. From a historical-critical perspective, the evidence is clear: women held recognized leadership roles in early Christian communities, and those roles were gradually suppressed, redefined, or erased as Christianity became institutionalized. This was not a matter of divine revelation changing its mind—it was power consolidation, Roman patriarchy, and institutional memory management. Women Who Held Formal Church Titles Episcopa Theodora (Rome, 9th century) A mosaic in the Chapel of St. Zeno in Rome explicitly names EPISCOPA THEODORA. Linguistically, episcopa is the feminine form of bishop—not “bishop’s wife,” which would ha...
Post a Comment
Read more