Buy a Sword? Jesus Wasn't Teaching Self-Defense

Buy a Sword? Jesus Wasn't Teaching Self-Defense


One of the more misused passages in modern Christian apologetics for violence or gun ownership is Luke 22:36, where Jesus says:


“But now let the one who has a moneybag take it, and likewise a knapsack. And let the one who has no sword sell his cloak and buy one.”


Some claim this is Jesus endorsing the right to self-defense. But when we read this verse in context—that interpretation quickly unravels.


Context: A Prophetic Setup, Not a Defense Strategy


Jesus spoke these words at the Last Supper, just before His arrest and crucifixion. In the very next breath, He quotes Isaiah 53:12:


“For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors.’ For what is written about me has its fulfillment.”


This gives us the interpretive key: Jesus wasn’t preparing His disciples for a physical battle. He was orchestrating a symbolic moment to fulfill prophecy. He would be counted among criminals. That required His followers to be visibly armed—just enough to appear “transgressive” in the eyes of the Roman and Jewish authorities.


Notably, the disciples say, “Lord, look, here are 

two swords.” And Jesus replies, “It is enough” (Luke 22:38). 


Two daggers among twelve men is hardly sufficient for a self-defense plan. But it’s more than enough for fulfilling prophecy.


The Sword Rejected: Jesus Rebukes Violence


When Peter (presumably) uses one of the swords to defend Jesus by cutting off the servant’s ear in Gethsemane, Jesus immediately stops him:


“No more of this!” (Luke 22:51) “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52)


Jesus then heals the injured man. The sword had a brief, prophetic role, not a practical one. In the very moment violence could be "justified" in the name of defense, Jesus shuts it down completely.


The Gospel: Weapons of a Different Kind


If Jesus were teaching His followers to take up arms, the apostles would have followed His lead. But Paul makes it clear:


“For though we walk in the flesh, we are not waging war according to the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not of the flesh but have divine power to destroy strongholds.” (2 Cor. 10:3-4)


Ours is a kingdom not of carnal might, but of the Spirit. We know that Jesus' kingdom came in its fullness at 70 AD. That means we are not waiting for battles or defending ourselves in the name of survival. We are the living presence of Christ, already raised and glorified, now ambassadors of peace in the world.


From Fear to Fullness


The sword in Luke 22 wasn’t about fear or defense. It was about identity—Jesus willingly stepping into the role of the suffering servant, the misunderstood Messiah, and the sin-bearer for a fading age. He absorbed the violence of the old world so that we wouldn’t have to perpetuate it.


The old covenant order—the age of the sword and vengeance—has passed away. The new age, inaugurated fully in 70 AD, is an age of presence, not preservation.


We are not here to fight to survive. We live because Christ already won. We don’t need swords; we carry the Word of God.


Conclusion


Jesus didn’t endorse violence in Luke 22. He prophetically fulfilled Scripture, only to immediately reject the very act of physical defense. His mission was to disarm the old age, not empower it. And now, living in the fullness of the New Creation, we don’t defend ourselves with steel—we transform the world with Spirit.


“Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good.” (Romans 12:21)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD

 No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD When Jesus said in Matthew 24:36, "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only," many have taken this to mean a far-future, end-of-the-world event. But what if this phrase had a much more specific meaning to Jesus’ Jewish audience—one tied to their festal calendar, their historical context, and even the events of 70 AD? Let’s unpack this verse and its connection to the Feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah), the idea of two witnesses, and the prophetic imagery of Revelation 11—all pointing to a first-century fulfillment. The Feast of Trumpets and the Phrase "No One Knows the Day or Hour" The phrase “no one knows the day or the hour” was commonly associated in Jewish idiom with the Feast of Trumpets—the only festival that began on a new moon (Tishri 1). Since the new moon is difficult to predict precisely, ancient I...
Read more

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference ***The Jews’ victory caused 75,310 people (Esther 9:10, 15, 16). This corresponds with the enemy deaths in Ezekiel 38-39. ·          Esther 9:10 10 the ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews. But they did not lay their hands on the plunder . ·          Esther 9:15-16 15 The Jews in Susa came together on the fourteenth day of the month of Adar, and they put to death in Susa three hundred men , but they did not lay their hands on the plunder . 16 Meanwhile, the remainder of the Jews who were in the king’s provinces also assembled to protect themselves and get relief from their enemies . They killed seventy-five thousand of them but did not lay their hands on the plunder. ·          Ezekiel 39:11 11 “‘On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, ...
Read more

Ezekiel 40

Image
INTRODUCTION Picture yourself as a Jew in the exile. You lost your home, your family, and even questioning your faith in the midst of God’s promises. You are traumatized and broken by the events that have transpired. All hope seems loss. Then Ezekiel the Priest says that you will inherit a new Temple and a new land with more responsibility added to you. More responsibility that you couldn’t fulfill the first time, which is why you are exiled in the first place. And get this, it is all invisible. This would have not gone well for Ezekiel by simply telling the Jews their inheritance was invisible. However, that’s not the case. Thankfully, our God is very descriptive about the measurements and dimensions of the Temple. We have a basis to compare the old Temple and old land to these new promises. Since the Jews were involved in the construction, they would be familiar with the size of the Temple and the land. When Ezekiel was telling the Jews about these measurements, it blew their mind...
Read more