Did Paul Approve Eating Food Sacrificed to Idols? No.
Did Paul Approve Eating Food Sacrificed to Idols? No.
One of the most misunderstood aspects of Paul’s teaching is the assumption that he gave Christians a free license to eat food sacrificed to idols. This idea is often drawn from 1 Corinthians 8 and 10, where Paul seems to speak permissively about eating such food. However, when we take the full counsel of Scripture—including the apostolic decree in Acts 15 and Jesus' words to the churches in Revelation 2—we find a more nuanced and consistent position.
1. Acts 15: The Jerusalem Council’s Clear Prohibition
The Jerusalem Council, where Paul was present and gave input (Acts 15:12), issued a decisive ruling regarding Gentile believers. Among the few essentials they were to observe was this command:
“...that you abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality.” (Acts 15:29)
This decree was not merely a temporary concession to Jewish sensibilities. It was delivered as a binding decision for all Gentile churches (cf. Acts 16:4) and was framed as something that “seemed good to the Holy Spirit” (Acts 15:28). That language strongly implies this was not optional or cultural but covenantal. The question we must ask, then, is: Did Paul later contradict this ruling?
2. 1 Corinthians 8 & 10: Knowledge vs. Love, Liberty vs. Idolatry
In 1 Corinthians 8, Paul acknowledges the logic of some believers who say,
“We know that an idol is nothing in the world” (v.4).
This knowledge, he says, is true—but warns:
“But not everyone possesses this knowledge. Some people are still so accustomed to idols that when they eat sacrificial food, they think of it as having been sacrificed to a god...” (v.7)
Paul affirms that food, in and of itself, does not commend us to God (v.8), but he is concerned that this so-called liberty can become a stumbling block to the weak. If your liberty causes a brother to fall, “you sin against Christ” (v.12).
Therefore:
“If what I eat causes my brother or sister to fall into sin, I will never eat meat again…” (v.13)
In chapter 10, Paul gets even more direct. He warns against the real danger of idolatry and spiritual fellowship with demons:
“Do I mean then that food sacrificed to an idol is anything, or that an idol is anything? No. But the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God…” (1 Cor. 10:19–20)
Then he issues a stern command:
“You cannot drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of demons too… Are we trying to arouse the Lord’s jealousy?” (vv.21–22)
This is not Paul giving permission. He is warning against being participants with demons through association and fellowship at pagan feasts. The key difference Paul makes is between meat sold in the marketplace with no known connection to idol worship, and meat eaten in a ritual context where idolatry is involved.
3. Revelation 2: Jesus' Rebuke of Idolatrous Compromise
In Revelation, Jesus addresses the churches of Pergamum and Thyatira and issues rebukes related to the very issue of food sacrificed to idols:
“But I have a few things against you: There are some among you who hold to the teaching of Balaam… who taught Balak to entice the Israelites to sin so that they ate food sacrificed to idols and committed sexual immorality.” (Rev. 2:14)
“Nevertheless, I have this against you: You tolerate that woman Jezebel… By her teaching she misleads my servants into sexual immorality and the eating of food sacrificed to idols.” (Rev. 2:20)
These warnings are not metaphors. Jesus is holding these churches accountable for permitting something explicitly condemned by the apostles decades earlier. And there is no correction of Paul—because Paul never permitted what they were doing. These churches were not innocently buying food in the market; they were tolerating syncretism—fellowshipping with pagan practices under the guise of Christian liberty.
Conclusion
Paul was part of the same Spirit-led council that gave clear instructions to Gentiles in Acts 15. His writings in 1 Corinthians do not contradict those instructions; rather, they expand on how to live them out with wisdom and love. He distinguishes between private conscience and public participation in idolatry. He warns sternly against fellowship with demons and elevates the call to love over the desire for liberty.
Revelation 2 confirms that Jesus still took these issues seriously decades later. The apostles were unified: eating food sacrificed to idols, especially in ways that blur the lines of worship, was and is incompatible with covenant faithfulness.
Christian liberty is not a license for compromise. It is a call to live wisely, lovingly, and loyally to the God who calls us out of darkness and into His marvelous light.
Comments
Post a Comment