God Never Allowed Incest: A Closer Look at Genesis and the Covenant

 God Never Allowed Incest: A Closer Look at Genesis and the Covenant


One of the most common assumptions people make when reading early Genesis is that God must have allowed incest temporarily after the creation of Adam and Eve. After all, where did Cain get his wife? But this assumption stems from a surface reading of the text and a misunderstanding of how the Genesis creation accounts are structured.


When we look more closely at the covenantal context of Genesis 1 and 2, a much richer—and more consistent—picture emerges. It reveals that God never condoned incest, and that the early chapters of Genesis describe two distinct groups of people: those outside of covenant (Day 6 humanity) and those inside it (Adam and Eve, the Day 7 family).



Genesis 1 and the Day 6 People: Humanity at Large


Genesis 1 tells us that God created humankind—male and female—on the sixth day:


“Then God said, ‘Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness’... So God created man in His own image... male and female He created them.” (Gen. 1:26–27)


This account speaks of humanity as a whole, not just a single pair. These people were told to “be fruitful and multiply” and to fill the earth. This large-scale creation of humankind on Day 6 establishes a broad, non-covenantal context—a population, not just a couple.


These people are not placed in the Garden and are not described as having a personal relationship with God. There’s no mention of divine commands, covenant, or God’s rest in their story.



Genesis 2 and the Day 7 People: The Covenant Family


Genesis 2 zooms in to focus on a specific man, Adam, whom God places in the Garden. Unlike the humanity of Day 6, Adam is:


Formed individually from the dust of the ground (Gen. 2:7)


Given breath directly from God (a covenantal marker)


Placed in a sacred space (Eden)


Given commands (do not eat from the tree)


Given a wife created from his own body, not from a broader human population



This is not a generic human creation; this is covenantal election. Adam and Eve are not “the first humans” in a biological sense—they are the first covenant people, created to dwell in God’s Day 7 rest and walk with Him in obedience.




Cain's Wife: Evidence of a Broader Human Population


Cain’s story reinforces this reading. After killing Abel, he fears that others will find and kill him (Gen. 4:14). But who are these “others” if Adam, Eve, Cain, and Abel were the only people alive?


Later in the text:


“Cain knew his wife, and she conceived...” (Gen. 4:17)



Where did she come from? The most reasonable explanation is that she came from the Day 6 population—people created outside the Garden, not descended from Adam and Eve. This eliminates the need for incest as an explanation. There is no indication that Cain married a sister or a close relative.



No Record of God Allowing Incest


Some argue that incest must have been “allowed” early on and only later prohibited by the Law of Moses. But Scripture never portrays incest as acceptable—not even temporarily. In fact:


Lot's daughters who slept with their father were not praised; their descendants became Israel’s enemies.


Leviticus 18 outlines strict prohibitions against uncovering the nakedness of close relatives—and these are presented as expressions of God’s enduring moral will.


Every time incest appears in the Bible, it's portrayed negatively—never as God's ideal or allowance.



There’s no progression from “acceptable” to “sinful.” Instead, incest is consistently associated with moral corruption, shame, and disorder.



God's Covenant Standards Were Present from the Beginning


God’s moral character does not change. The idea that He would permit something as harmful and dishonoring as incest—especially within a covenant family—is inconsistent with His holiness.


Genesis 1–2 paints a picture not of shifting ethics, but of two parallel human lineages:


One rooted in the natural world (Day 6)


One rooted in divine relationship and purpose (Day 7)



Adam and Eve, as the covenant couple, were not meant to reproduce through incest. Cain’s wife did not have to be his sister. And nowhere in the Bible is incest ever shown to be a divine provision.




Conclusion


The biblical story does not require us to believe that God allowed incest for a time. Rather, it points us to a consistent ethic, rooted in covenant and creation. God’s plan has always been to establish a holy people, set apart in purity and love. Incest has no place in that vision.


By recognizing the distinction between the broader humanity of Genesis 1 and the covenantal focus of Genesis 2, we see that

 God never changed His mind about incest—He never approved it in the first place.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD

 No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD When Jesus said in Matthew 24:36, "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only," many have taken this to mean a far-future, end-of-the-world event. But what if this phrase had a much more specific meaning to Jesus’ Jewish audience—one tied to their festal calendar, their historical context, and even the events of 70 AD? Let’s unpack this verse and its connection to the Feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah), the idea of two witnesses, and the prophetic imagery of Revelation 11—all pointing to a first-century fulfillment. The Feast of Trumpets and the Phrase "No One Knows the Day or Hour" The phrase “no one knows the day or the hour” was commonly associated in Jewish idiom with the Feast of Trumpets—the only festival that began on a new moon (Tishri 1). Since the new moon is difficult to predict precisely, ancient I...
Read more

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference ***The Jews’ victory caused 75,310 people (Esther 9:10, 15, 16). This corresponds with the enemy deaths in Ezekiel 38-39. ·          Esther 9:10 10 the ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews. But they did not lay their hands on the plunder . ·          Esther 9:15-16 15 The Jews in Susa came together on the fourteenth day of the month of Adar, and they put to death in Susa three hundred men , but they did not lay their hands on the plunder . 16 Meanwhile, the remainder of the Jews who were in the king’s provinces also assembled to protect themselves and get relief from their enemies . They killed seventy-five thousand of them but did not lay their hands on the plunder. ·          Ezekiel 39:11 11 “‘On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, ...
Read more

Ezekiel 40

Image
INTRODUCTION Picture yourself as a Jew in the exile. You lost your home, your family, and even questioning your faith in the midst of God’s promises. You are traumatized and broken by the events that have transpired. All hope seems loss. Then Ezekiel the Priest says that you will inherit a new Temple and a new land with more responsibility added to you. More responsibility that you couldn’t fulfill the first time, which is why you are exiled in the first place. And get this, it is all invisible. This would have not gone well for Ezekiel by simply telling the Jews their inheritance was invisible. However, that’s not the case. Thankfully, our God is very descriptive about the measurements and dimensions of the Temple. We have a basis to compare the old Temple and old land to these new promises. Since the Jews were involved in the construction, they would be familiar with the size of the Temple and the land. When Ezekiel was telling the Jews about these measurements, it blew their mind...
Read more