Inc@$t and Y@G: A Modern Day Double Standard

 Inc@$t and Y@G: A  Modern Day Double Standard 


Let me be clear from the start: I do not advocate for either Inc@$t or Y@G behavior. Both are biblically and morally wrong. However, the cultural logic and legal landscape surrounding them reveals an interesting contradiction. In today’s society, consensual Y@G relationships are celebrated—even codified into marriage law—while Inc@$t, even among consenting adults, remains illegal and taboo. Why the inconsistency?


If we’re going to evaluate actions purely on secular grounds—like consent, harm, and evolutionary value—Inc@$t might actually seem more defensible than Y@G. Inc@$t, while still morally objectionable, at least involves the potential for procreation, which is essential to biological and societal continuity. It aligns with the evolutionary impulse to reproduce. Y@G, by its very nature, cannot produce life, and so serves no reproductive or evolutionary function. From a cold materialist standpoint, that should raise questions—yet it doesn’t.


People often cite the risk of genetic defects as a reason Inc@$t is wrong. But this argument is frequently overstated. Many non-Inc@$t couples also carry recessive traits and risks for genetic disease. Society doesn’t prevent them from marrying or reproducing. Meanwhile, Y@G unions—entirely sterile by design—face no legal barrier. This double standard suggests the issue isn't really about logic, harm, or biology. It’s about cultural preference.


Conclusion 

Again, to be clear: Inc@$t is wrong. Y@G is also wrong. But when our laws and ethics become inconsistent—accepting one while demonizing the other without rational basis—we reveal a society driven less by truth and more by trend. As someone shaped by Scripture, I believe both acts fall outside God's design. But even if we put the Bible aside, it’s worth asking why our culture upholds such selective standards of morality.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 40

A Preterist Postmillennial Commentary-Revelation 1-11 (PPC)