Jonah and Paul: A Case of Resistance, Not Irresistible Grace

Jonah and Paul: A Case of Resistance, Not Irresistible Grace


Jonah’s story is a prime example of someone resisting God's will. When God commanded him to preach to Nineveh, Jonah did not immediately comply. Instead, he actively fled in the opposite direction:


“But Jonah rose to flee to Tarshish from the presence of the Lord. He went down to Joppa and found a ship going to Tarshish.” (Jonah 1:3, ESV)


Jonah was clearly resisting God’s command. If grace were truly irresistible, Jonah would have obeyed immediately. Instead, he chose to run away, which resulted in severe consequences—being thrown into the sea and swallowed by a great fish. Only after experiencing hardship did Jonah finally submit:


“Then Jonah prayed to the Lord his God from the belly of the fish.” (Jonah 2:1)


Jonah’s story demonstrates that God can be resisted, though He may use external circumstances to bring people to repentance. Jonah ultimately obeyed, but not because God’s grace was irresistible—rather, it was because God disciplined him until he yielded. This is far from the Calvinistic idea that God’s grace cannot be refused. Additionally, even after Jonah preached to Nineveh and saw their repentance, he still resisted God's mercy toward them:


“But it displeased Jonah exceedingly, and he was angry.” (Jonah 4:1)


This further demonstrates that Jonah’s heart was not irresistibly changed—he continued to struggle with God's will even after submitting externally.


Paul’s Conversion: A Dramatic Encounter, Not Irresistible Grace


Paul’s conversion on the road to Damascus (Acts 9) is often cited as a key example of irresistible grace. However, Paul's experience actually shows that he had been resisting God for some time. When Jesus appeared to him, He said:


“Saul, Saul, why are you persecuting me? … It is hard for you to kick against the goads.” (Acts 9:4-5)


The phrase "kick against the goads" was a common expression referring to resisting authority. This implies that Paul had already been experiencing conviction and resisting God’s truth before this encounter. He had been persecuting Christians, but it seems his conscience had been pricked—possibly by witnessing Stephen’s martyrdom (Acts 7:58) or seeing the faith of those he persecuted.


Furthermore, Paul did not immediately accept Christ. He was blind for three days, fasting and praying (Acts 9:9). This was a time of reflection and decision-making. If grace were irresistible, Paul would have immediately rejoiced in his new faith. Instead, he underwent a process before fully embracing Christ.


Finally, Paul’s conversion was unique because it involved a direct, miraculous appearance of Christ. Most people do not experience such an encounter, yet many still reject the gospel. If Paul’s experience is an example of irresistible grace, then why doesn’t Jesus forcefully appear to all unbelievers in the same way? Clearly, Jesus' approach with Paul was special, not a universal model for all conversions.


Conclusion


Both Jonah and Paul initially resisted God’s calling. Jonah actively fled, and Paul "kicked against the goads." In both cases, God pursued them, but He did not override their will. Jonah repented only after severe consequences, and Paul needed time to process and accept Christ’s lordship. Their stories demonstrate that God's grace is powerful and persistent, but not irresistible in the Calvinistic sense.


Rather than proving irresistible grace, Jonah and Paul’s experiences illustrate that while God’s grace is sovereignly extended, people can resist before ultimately yielding. This aligns with the broader biblical teaching that God's grace calls all to repentance, but individuals must choose to submit to it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD

 No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD When Jesus said in Matthew 24:36, "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only," many have taken this to mean a far-future, end-of-the-world event. But what if this phrase had a much more specific meaning to Jesus’ Jewish audience—one tied to their festal calendar, their historical context, and even the events of 70 AD? Let’s unpack this verse and its connection to the Feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah), the idea of two witnesses, and the prophetic imagery of Revelation 11—all pointing to a first-century fulfillment. The Feast of Trumpets and the Phrase "No One Knows the Day or Hour" The phrase “no one knows the day or the hour” was commonly associated in Jewish idiom with the Feast of Trumpets—the only festival that began on a new moon (Tishri 1). Since the new moon is difficult to predict precisely, ancient I...
Read more

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference ***The Jews’ victory caused 75,310 people (Esther 9:10, 15, 16). This corresponds with the enemy deaths in Ezekiel 38-39. ·          Esther 9:10 10 the ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews. But they did not lay their hands on the plunder . ·          Esther 9:15-16 15 The Jews in Susa came together on the fourteenth day of the month of Adar, and they put to death in Susa three hundred men , but they did not lay their hands on the plunder . 16 Meanwhile, the remainder of the Jews who were in the king’s provinces also assembled to protect themselves and get relief from their enemies . They killed seventy-five thousand of them but did not lay their hands on the plunder. ·          Ezekiel 39:11 11 “‘On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, ...
Read more

Ezekiel 40

Image
INTRODUCTION Picture yourself as a Jew in the exile. You lost your home, your family, and even questioning your faith in the midst of God’s promises. You are traumatized and broken by the events that have transpired. All hope seems loss. Then Ezekiel the Priest says that you will inherit a new Temple and a new land with more responsibility added to you. More responsibility that you couldn’t fulfill the first time, which is why you are exiled in the first place. And get this, it is all invisible. This would have not gone well for Ezekiel by simply telling the Jews their inheritance was invisible. However, that’s not the case. Thankfully, our God is very descriptive about the measurements and dimensions of the Temple. We have a basis to compare the old Temple and old land to these new promises. Since the Jews were involved in the construction, they would be familiar with the size of the Temple and the land. When Ezekiel was telling the Jews about these measurements, it blew their mind...
Read more