Misusing the Sword: The Misapplication of “Shunning” in 1 Corinthians
Misusing the Sword: The Misapplication of “Shunning” in 1 Corinthians
When Paul wrote 1 Corinthians, he was addressing a community in spiritual chaos. Division, sexual immorality, lawsuits among believers, and confusion about the Lord’s Supper were tearing at the fabric of the body of Christ. In the midst of this, Paul delivers a hard but necessary word:
“...not to keep company with anyone named a brother who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.” (1 Corinthians 5:11, NKJV)
This verse is often cited as the basis for shunning—cutting off contact, avoiding conversation, excluding from community. But over the centuries, Paul’s instruction has been twisted into a harsh, isolating practice that often bears more resemblance to Pharisaic exclusion than to gospel correction.
Context Matters: Corinth and the Crisis of Identity
In 1 Corinthians 5, Paul confronts a man living in a kind of sexual sin so extreme that even the pagans found it shocking: “a man has his father's wife.” The church wasn’t mourning this—they were tolerating and even boasting. Paul is shocked not just by the sin, but by the lack of spiritual discipline.
His command to “deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh” (5:5) was not a death sentence—it was a wake-up call. It was spiritual tough love. Paul’s goal wasn’t vengeance or exile. It was restoration: “that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.”
In fact, by 2 Corinthians, it seems the man had repented, and Paul urges the church to forgive and comfort him, “lest perhaps such a one be swallowed up with too much sorrow” (2 Cor 2:7). This proves that the goal of discipline was never permanent separation—but eventual healing.
What Paul Meant—and Didn’t Mean—by “Not Even to Eat”
Paul wasn’t instructing believers to shun sinners out of self-righteous superiority. He was calling for the removal of hypocrisy from within the body, not isolation from the world:
“I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world... For then you would need to go out of the world.” (1 Corinthians 5:9–10)
This is key: Paul is not telling the church to avoid unbelievers who sin. He’s warning against those who claim to be brothers or sisters in Christ while persistently walking in destructive behavior without repentance. “Not even to eat” reflects table fellowship—a sign of unity and shared identity. If someone is destroying that unity with unrepentant sin, it’s not appropriate to pretend nothing is wrong at the communion table. But this doesn’t mean the church should treat them with hatred, contempt, or lifelong exile.
Church Discipline ≠ Social Exile
Unfortunately, many modern applications of this passage veer into legalistic shunning—where individuals are entirely cut off from friendships, family relationships, and spiritual conversation. Instead of guiding people back to truth and restoration, some communities use 1 Corinthians 5 as a weapon to control behavior, silence dissent, or punish minor disagreements. This is not what Paul taught. Paul wept over his churches (2 Cor 2:4). He sought to “restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness” (Gal 6:1). His confrontation was always tied to hope, not exclusion for exclusion’s sake.
In the New Covenant City, Healing Is the Goal
The Body of Christ is a clean vessel—not because we have no struggles, but because Christ has made us holy. When sin disrupts that identity, loving discipline may be necessary—but its goal is always to reconcile, not reject.
Revelation paints the New Jerusalem as a city with open gates—welcoming the nations, healing them with the leaves of the Tree of Life. This doesn’t mean tolerating unrepentance, but it does mean the church reflects the heart of God, who is “not willing that any should perish” (2 Peter 3:9).
Conclusion
Shunning, when misapplied, becomes spiritual abuse. It replaces gospel healing with social exile and distorts the purpose of church discipline. Paul’s words in 1 Corinthians 5 were not about creating spiritual outcasts. They were about preserving the integrity of the body without losing the heartbeat of grace. Yes, there is a time to draw boundaries. But in every boundary, there must be a door—and in every act of correction, there must be the hope of return.
Comments
Post a Comment