Appeal to Mystery: Why the Trinity Can’t Be Tested if It's Always a Theological Minefield

Appeal to Mystery: Why the Trinity Can’t Be Tested if It's Always a Theological Minefield


One of the most common defenses of the doctrine of the Trinity is the appeal to mystery. When critics raise questions about how God can be three and one at the same time—without slipping into heresies like modalism, tritheism, or subordinationism—they’re often met with this phrase: “It’s a divine mystery. The secret things belong to the Lord.” But this response isn’t just unhelpful—it’s a theological cop-out.


The Bible calls believers to “test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1). We’re told to “examine everything carefully and hold fast to what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). We’re encouraged to grow in understanding, reason together, and know the truth that sets us free. Yet, when it comes to the Trinity, any attempt to define or test it inevitably lands in one of several condemned heresies:


Say the Father, Son, and Spirit are just different roles? That’s modalism.


Say they are three distinct beings? That’s tritheism.


Say the Son and Spirit are inferior in rank? That’s subordinationism.


Say Jesus has two minds or two persons? That’s Nestorianism.


Try to clarify how God can be both one and three without contradiction? You’re told: “It’s a mystery.”



At some point, we have to ask: If no version of the Trinity can be clearly articulated without violating logic or Scripture, how can we “test the spirits”?


Even more fundamentally—how do we know Athanasius got it right? The fourth-century bishop’s theology became the cornerstone of Nicene orthodoxy, but why are we required to believe his metaphysical explanation of God as eternal “co-equal, co-eternal persons” under threat of heresy? Athanasius was a brilliant thinker, but he was also a man shaped by his time, by Greek philosophy, and by the political struggles of the early Church. His views were formed centuries after the apostles. So why do we treat his categories as untouchable?


Appealing to mystery at this point does more harm than good. It shuts down critical thought and shields the doctrine from biblical accountability. But that’s not how truth works. Truth is testable. Truth is consistent. And truth does not fear examination.


Deuteronomy 29:29 says, “The secret things belong to the Lord, but the things revealed belong to us and to our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.” This verse doesn’t promote blind acceptance of unclear theology. Instead, it tells us that God has revealed enough for us to walk faithfully and understand His will. If the Trinity is essential for salvation—as many claim—then shouldn’t it be something clearly revealed and explainable?


The earliest Christians didn’t use Greek metaphysical categories to describe God. They proclaimed that the Father is the one true God (John 17:3), that Jesus is the Messiah, the Son of God (Matthew 16:16), and that the Spirit is God's empowering presence (Acts 2). These descriptions are relational, accessible, and testable through Scripture. They don’t require mental gymnastics or philosophical paradoxes.



Conclusion 


Appealing to mystery might feel reverent, but when used to defend a doctrine no one can explain without slipping into heresy, it becomes a shield for man-made tradition—not divine truth. Let’s stop hiding behind mystery. Let’s test what we've been handed. If we can’t define it, we can't discern it. And if we can't discern it, we shouldn’t dogmatize it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD

 No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD When Jesus said in Matthew 24:36, "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only," many have taken this to mean a far-future, end-of-the-world event. But what if this phrase had a much more specific meaning to Jesus’ Jewish audience—one tied to their festal calendar, their historical context, and even the events of 70 AD? Let’s unpack this verse and its connection to the Feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah), the idea of two witnesses, and the prophetic imagery of Revelation 11—all pointing to a first-century fulfillment. The Feast of Trumpets and the Phrase "No One Knows the Day or Hour" The phrase “no one knows the day or the hour” was commonly associated in Jewish idiom with the Feast of Trumpets—the only festival that began on a new moon (Tishri 1). Since the new moon is difficult to predict precisely, ancient I...
Read more

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference ***The Jews’ victory caused 75,310 people (Esther 9:10, 15, 16). This corresponds with the enemy deaths in Ezekiel 38-39. ·          Esther 9:10 10 the ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews. But they did not lay their hands on the plunder . ·          Esther 9:15-16 15 The Jews in Susa came together on the fourteenth day of the month of Adar, and they put to death in Susa three hundred men , but they did not lay their hands on the plunder . 16 Meanwhile, the remainder of the Jews who were in the king’s provinces also assembled to protect themselves and get relief from their enemies . They killed seventy-five thousand of them but did not lay their hands on the plunder. ·          Ezekiel 39:11 11 “‘On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, ...
Read more

Ezekiel 40

Image
INTRODUCTION Picture yourself as a Jew in the exile. You lost your home, your family, and even questioning your faith in the midst of God’s promises. You are traumatized and broken by the events that have transpired. All hope seems loss. Then Ezekiel the Priest says that you will inherit a new Temple and a new land with more responsibility added to you. More responsibility that you couldn’t fulfill the first time, which is why you are exiled in the first place. And get this, it is all invisible. This would have not gone well for Ezekiel by simply telling the Jews their inheritance was invisible. However, that’s not the case. Thankfully, our God is very descriptive about the measurements and dimensions of the Temple. We have a basis to compare the old Temple and old land to these new promises. Since the Jews were involved in the construction, they would be familiar with the size of the Temple and the land. When Ezekiel was telling the Jews about these measurements, it blew their mind...
Read more