Progressive Revelation or Cultural Interaction? A Look at the Bible Development

Progressive Revelation or Cultural Interaction? A Look at the Bible Development 


Christians often hear the phrase progressive revelation—the idea that God gradually revealed more truth throughout the Bible until the fullness of Christ. While this explanation is neat, a better lens is cultural interaction: God was engaging different peoples at different times, working within their worldview, language, and expectations. What looks like “progressive revelation” is really a record of how Israel’s understanding shifted through cultural influence, exile, foreign ideas, and eventually, the radical re-centering in Christ. Let’s consider ten areas where this plays out.



1. No Demon Possession in the Old Testament


The Old Testament never speaks of people being “possessed by demons.” Illness, madness, or misfortune were usually blamed on God, disobedience, or sometimes evil spirits—but never framed like the New Testament’s stories. The demonology of Jesus’ day reflects Persian and Hellenistic influence, where spirits were thought to invade and torment. Jesus entered this worldview, confronting people’s fears with authority, but this doesn’t mean possession suddenly came into existence. It means Israel’s cultural categories shifted.



2. Satan’s Role in the Old Testament


In the Hebrew Scriptures, satan often just means “adversary,” even applied to human opponents (e.g., 1 Sam. 29:4). In Job, “the satan” appears more like a prosecuting attorney in God’s court than the cosmic enemy of later Christian thought. Only through later Jewish interaction with Persian dualism and apocalyptic literature did Satan evolve into the great accuser and deceiver. The role wasn’t progressively revealed by God—it was culturally redefined.




3. Concepts of Salvation


The Old Testament doesn't speak of “salvation” in the eternal sense. Salvation meant deliverance from enemies, famine, or destruction. After exile and under foreign empires, salvation began to carry the weight of cosmic rescue, eventually reframed in the New Testament around resurrection life and union with Christ. Again, this shift was not God slowly “revealing more truth,” but Israel’s lived experience expanding the meaning of salvation.




4. Heaven


The patriarchs never dreamed of “going to heaven.” Heaven was God’s realm, not humanity’s destination. Hope was tied to land, descendants, and blessing. Under Hellenistic influence, heaven became imagined as the ultimate place of reward. The New Testament brings a radical reframing: heaven is where Christ rules, and eternal life means sharing His life now, not a sky-retirement plan.



5. Sheol


For the earliest Israelites, Sheol was the shadowy realm of the dead where all went, righteous or wicked alike. It was neither hell nor heaven, but simply the end of life. Over centuries, influenced by Greek philosophy and Persian afterlife ideas, Sheol was reshaped into differentiated fates of the dead—eventually producing notions of paradise and torment.




6. Angels


In the Torah, angels are rare and often just appear as messengers. By the Second Temple period, they become a highly developed hierarchy, guarding nations, recording deeds, and fighting spiritual battles. This wasn’t God “progressively revealing” a hidden truth but Israel absorbing imagery from Babylonian, Persian, and Greek cosmologies.




7. Law and Covenant


Moses’ Law was not originally understood as a temporary tutor pointing to Christ—it was Israel’s constitution, binding them as a nation. Only after the Law failed to hold the people together through exile did Jews and later Christians reflect on its limits. Paul’s interpretation reframed covenant as Spirit over letter, not because God kept secrets, but because Israel’s history revealed the Law’s inability to bring life.




8. Resurrection


Resurrection is absent in most of the Old Testament. Israel’s earliest hope was simply long life and descendants. Only in the later books (like Daniel) do we see resurrection language, shaped by Persian and apocalyptic thought. By the time of Jesus, resurrection had become a central debate among Jewish sects. Christ confirmed resurrection, not as a newly revealed idea, but as the fulfillment of Israel’s wrestle with mortality and God’s faithfulness.




9. Messiah


The idea of Messiah shifts dramatically. Early Israel expected kings and deliverers like David. Post-exile, the Messiah became the hoped-for liberator from foreign powers. Under Greek and Roman occupation, this hope intensified into apocalyptic dreams. Jesus fulfilled this—but not as expected. He redefined Messiahship around suffering, servanthood, and resurrection. That redefinition was not “progressive revelation,” but confrontation with cultural assumptions.




10. Wisdom


In Proverbs, wisdom is practical: skill in living well, avoiding folly. Later writings like Job and Ecclesiastes wrestle with wisdom’s limits, showing that life is often unjust and unpredictable. In the Hellenistic era, wisdom became cosmic—almost personified as an eternal mediator (e.g., Wisdom of Solomon). By the time of Paul, Christ is declared “the wisdom of God.” This trajectory isn’t linear revelation but wisdom literature colliding with Greek philosophy and apocalyptic struggle.



11. Sin


In the earliest parts of the Old Testament, sin is mostly covenantal and communal—it’s about breaking God’s commands, defiling the land, or bringing judgment on the nation. Individual moral failure was acknowledged, but it was usually tied to how it affected the community’s standing before God. By the exile, sin became seen more personally and spiritually, as Israel reflected on why their nation had fallen. Later, under Hellenistic influence, sin began to be imagined not just as disobedience, but as a kind of cosmic bondage connected to evil powers. By the New Testament, Paul frames sin as a power ruling over humanity, something requiring liberation rather than mere ritual cleansing. This wasn’t God hiding the “true meaning” of sin until later—it was Israel’s categories deepening and shifting as they interacted with new cultures and experiences.





Conclusion


What many call “progressive revelation” is better understood as God meeting His people in the middle of cultural interaction. Rather than unveiling a step-by-step divine plan, God speaks into the realities, assumptions, and struggles of His covenant people at a given time. The Law, the prophets, and even the coming of Christ engage directly with human understanding, customs, and limitations. Each stage reflects God’s presence and guidance

 shaping humanity toward covenantal life.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD

 No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD When Jesus said in Matthew 24:36, "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only," many have taken this to mean a far-future, end-of-the-world event. But what if this phrase had a much more specific meaning to Jesus’ Jewish audience—one tied to their festal calendar, their historical context, and even the events of 70 AD? Let’s unpack this verse and its connection to the Feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah), the idea of two witnesses, and the prophetic imagery of Revelation 11—all pointing to a first-century fulfillment. The Feast of Trumpets and the Phrase "No One Knows the Day or Hour" The phrase “no one knows the day or the hour” was commonly associated in Jewish idiom with the Feast of Trumpets—the only festival that began on a new moon (Tishri 1). Since the new moon is difficult to predict precisely, ancient I...
Read more

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference ***The Jews’ victory caused 75,310 people (Esther 9:10, 15, 16). This corresponds with the enemy deaths in Ezekiel 38-39. ·          Esther 9:10 10 the ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews. But they did not lay their hands on the plunder . ·          Esther 9:15-16 15 The Jews in Susa came together on the fourteenth day of the month of Adar, and they put to death in Susa three hundred men , but they did not lay their hands on the plunder . 16 Meanwhile, the remainder of the Jews who were in the king’s provinces also assembled to protect themselves and get relief from their enemies . They killed seventy-five thousand of them but did not lay their hands on the plunder. ·          Ezekiel 39:11 11 “‘On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, ...
Read more

Ezekiel 40

Image
INTRODUCTION Picture yourself as a Jew in the exile. You lost your home, your family, and even questioning your faith in the midst of God’s promises. You are traumatized and broken by the events that have transpired. All hope seems loss. Then Ezekiel the Priest says that you will inherit a new Temple and a new land with more responsibility added to you. More responsibility that you couldn’t fulfill the first time, which is why you are exiled in the first place. And get this, it is all invisible. This would have not gone well for Ezekiel by simply telling the Jews their inheritance was invisible. However, that’s not the case. Thankfully, our God is very descriptive about the measurements and dimensions of the Temple. We have a basis to compare the old Temple and old land to these new promises. Since the Jews were involved in the construction, they would be familiar with the size of the Temple and the land. When Ezekiel was telling the Jews about these measurements, it blew their mind...
Read more