When Exceptions Destroy the Rule: How the Bible’s 2–3 Witness Law Falls Apart

When Exceptions Destroy the Rule: How the Bible’s 2–3 Witness Law Falls Apart


One of the most confidently repeated claims among Christians and apologists is the idea that the Bible provides a clear and universal standard of truth: every matter must be established by two or three witnesses. It sounds neat, rigorous, and judicial. It’s quoted as though it forms the backbone of biblical legal ethics—from Deuteronomy all the way to Jesus and Paul.


But a deeper look reveals a far more uncomfortable reality:

the Bible both commands this rule and violates it constantly.

And when modern believers create ad hoc exceptions to rescue the rule, they fall into special pleading—a logical fallacy that exposes the inconsistency of the whole system.


This blog breaks down why the 2–3 witness rule cannot be defended consistently and why attempts to do so ultimately collapse.



1. The Bible Presents the Witness Rule as Universal


The Torah frames the rule as absolute:


“A matter must be established by two or three witnesses.” (Deut. 19:15)


“No one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness.” (Deut. 17:6)


“On the evidence of witnesses, someone may be executed, but not on the evidence of one.” (Num. 35:30)



The New Testament repeats it uncritically:


“Take two or three witnesses.” (Matt. 18:16)


“Do not accept an accusation except on two or three witnesses.” (1 Tim. 5:19)


“The law requires two or three witnesses.” (Heb. 10:28)



There are no explicit exceptions given.

No footnotes, no caveats, no conditions.


It is presented as a universal standard.




2. But the Bible Breaks the Rule Repeatedly


If the 2–3 witness rule is universal, the Bible violates it all over the place.


Achan (Joshua 7)


God condemns a man based on divine accusation alone—no witnesses.


Gehazi (2 Kings 5)


Elisha curses Gehazi with leprosy without any legal process or corroborating testimony.


Prophetic Accusations


Prophets frequently accuse nations and kings without any witnesses at all. They simply declare guilt.


Paul’s Conversion


Paul’s entire authority rests on a private vision where no two witnesses heard, saw, or understood the same thing. Worse, Acts tells the story three different ways.


The Resurrection


The central claim of Christianity—the resurrection—lacks anything close to the Deuteronomic witness standard.

Different gospels disagree on who saw what, when, how, and in what order.


Jesus’ Trial


Even the trial of Jesus features contradictory witnesses. The Sanhedrin still reaches a verdict.


In every one of these cases, the biblical system bypasses or breaks its own legal rule.




3. Special Pleading: The Apologist’s Escape Hatch


To defend the Bible, apologists create exceptions that do not appear in the text.


Common examples:


“God doesn’t need witnesses.”


But the law never says “2–3 witnesses, unless God says otherwise.”

This is pure invention.


“Prophets speaking for God don’t need witnesses.”


If anything, prophets making accusations should need witnesses more, not less.


“These weren’t court settings.”


Many absolutely were legal contexts, and the law does not restrict itself to courts.


“Miracles don’t need witnesses.”


The Bible does not say that—and this exception conveniently protects supernatural claims.


These are ad hoc exceptions, created only when the rule becomes inconvenient.

That is the textbook definition of special pleading.




4. If Applied Consistently, the Rule Would Destroy Christianity


A consistent application of the 2–3 witness standard would invalidate:




Paul’s Apostleship


No two witnesses saw his revelation. Acts contradicts itself.


His entire authority collapses.


The Resurrection Narratives


The inconsistencies and lack of corroboration would be fatal in a legal framework.




Private Revelations


Daniel, Ezekiel, and John’s visions become inadmissible testimony.




Many Teachings of Jesus


Large portions of Jesus’ sayings occur with no witnesses present.




Miracle Claims


Many miracles are private or reported by a sole narrator.


Ironically, the biblical witness rule—if consistently applied—would eliminate the foundations of the religion that promotes it.



6. The Witness Rule Seems Universal Only Because People Don’t Read Carefully


A surface-level reading makes it look like a universal ethical guideline.


But an honest analysis shows:


the rule is contradicted,


exceptions are invented,


the text is inconsistent,


and believers apply it only when it benefits their argument.



The rule ends up being rhetorical, not ethical.

A slogan, not a standard.



Conclusion


A rule that can be broken anytime is not a rule. If you can invent exceptions on the fly to preserve your theology, your rule has no meaning.


The biblical 2–3 witness standard collapses under its own weight:


the text violates it,


the theology bypasses it,


the apologists special-plead around it,


and a consistent application would dismantle Christianity entirely.


A rule that must be selectively defended is not a principle—it’s a patch.


And a rule that destroys the faith when taken seriously reveals more about the human nature of the Bible than it does about any divine lawgiver.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD

 No One Knows the Day or Hour — Matthew 24:36, the Feast of Trumpets, and the Witness of 70 AD When Jesus said in Matthew 24:36, "But concerning that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, nor the Son, but the Father only," many have taken this to mean a far-future, end-of-the-world event. But what if this phrase had a much more specific meaning to Jesus’ Jewish audience—one tied to their festal calendar, their historical context, and even the events of 70 AD? Let’s unpack this verse and its connection to the Feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah), the idea of two witnesses, and the prophetic imagery of Revelation 11—all pointing to a first-century fulfillment. The Feast of Trumpets and the Phrase "No One Knows the Day or Hour" The phrase “no one knows the day or the hour” was commonly associated in Jewish idiom with the Feast of Trumpets—the only festival that began on a new moon (Tishri 1). Since the new moon is difficult to predict precisely, ancient I...
Read more

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference ***The Jews’ victory caused 75,310 people (Esther 9:10, 15, 16). This corresponds with the enemy deaths in Ezekiel 38-39. ·          Esther 9:10 10 the ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews. But they did not lay their hands on the plunder . ·          Esther 9:15-16 15 The Jews in Susa came together on the fourteenth day of the month of Adar, and they put to death in Susa three hundred men , but they did not lay their hands on the plunder . 16 Meanwhile, the remainder of the Jews who were in the king’s provinces also assembled to protect themselves and get relief from their enemies . They killed seventy-five thousand of them but did not lay their hands on the plunder. ·          Ezekiel 39:11 11 “‘On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, ...
Read more

Ezekiel 40

Image
INTRODUCTION Picture yourself as a Jew in the exile. You lost your home, your family, and even questioning your faith in the midst of God’s promises. You are traumatized and broken by the events that have transpired. All hope seems loss. Then Ezekiel the Priest says that you will inherit a new Temple and a new land with more responsibility added to you. More responsibility that you couldn’t fulfill the first time, which is why you are exiled in the first place. And get this, it is all invisible. This would have not gone well for Ezekiel by simply telling the Jews their inheritance was invisible. However, that’s not the case. Thankfully, our God is very descriptive about the measurements and dimensions of the Temple. We have a basis to compare the old Temple and old land to these new promises. Since the Jews were involved in the construction, they would be familiar with the size of the Temple and the land. When Ezekiel was telling the Jews about these measurements, it blew their mind...
Read more