Matthew 5 and Divorce: Grounds for Abuse

Matthew 5 and Divorce: Grounds for Abuse

Divorce is one of the most controversial issues in the Church today. In the Bible, there is a handful of passages that talk about marriage and divorce-more in the New than in the Old Testament. Unfortunately, the Church has done a poor job in the areas of abuse. Most Christians believe that there are ONLY two permissible reasons :Physical Adultery and Physical Abandonment. Simply because it is explicit.
In one of the infamous divorce passages in Matthew 5, if you noticed VERY CAREFULLY, Jesus talks about Lust BEFORE and OATHS after the topic of divorce. If we interpret Lust and Oaths figuratively, then TO BE CONSISTENT you need to interpret the divorce passage figuratively as well. Otherwise, you would need to chop off your limbs and LITERALLY never make an oath, which would be a difficult if not possible venture. We all make oaths for marriage, court proceedings, work, loans, extracurricular activity memberships, church membership, etc.
So what was Jesus saying??? Jesus was saying to the original audience-The crowds and Pharisees, (not modern day America), that if you divorce for petty reasons, your divorce is invalid and by your sinful choice you have inadvertently caused the innocent spouse to be labelled as an adulteress.
In that culture, men who divorced their wives, put their wives in a very difficult position financially. The possible choices they had was to move back with their father (if he was alive or if he could handle the social shame), live as a poor beggar, and/or be a prostitute.
Linking this with the earlier lust passage, it is easy to see a Pharisee lusting after a woman, seducing her, and then marrying her because his wife was physically unattractive. The Pharisee's wife and the woman's husband would be labelled as adulterers because of the perpetrators' choice. The marriage was not broken for valid reasons. Again, this is hyperbole, Jesus was not creating a marriage/divorce manifesto.
It is surprising that so many would deny this interpretation, yet they create interpretational leeway for their doctrines such as infant baptism and end times views- Gog and Magog is Russia. Where is the consistency??? Divorce should be pursued for severe situations where destructive patterns have failed to be addressed and/or remedied for a particular period of time. Each case is not the same and should be treated with care. Destructive marriages are not prison sentences.
You don't have to be an egalitarian to respect a woman, you just need to be a human being.





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

13 Reasons Why a Spiritual Resurrection in 70 AD Should Be Considered Over a Physical Resurrection

13 Reasons Why a Spiritual Resurrection in 70 AD Should Be Considered Over a Physical Resurrection 1. When did the Old Testament (OT) Saints leave Sheol/Hades to go to Heaven? Surprisingly, many believe that the OT Saints went to Heaven at the Cross. This is not true. In Acts 2, we see that Christ the Greater David was the ONLY person granted a physical resurrection AND ascension. The physical resurrection and ascension of Christ in 30AD pointed as well as confirmed the spiritual resurrection of the OT saints in 70 AD. King David was still in his grave, not Christ. See Acts 2:22-34. When Christ ascended to Heaven in Acts 1:9-11, He ascended ALONE. Later, in Acts 7:60, when Stephen was stoned to death, it says he fell ASLEEP . It says NOTHING about his spirit going up to Heaven with the Lord.  This is especially confirmed if you read Psalm 31 in its full context. Otherwise, you are imposing something foreign into the text. In Matthew 27:51-53, there were a number of dead sain...
Read more

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference

Ezekiel 38-39 has been fulfilled in the book of Esther-Quick Reference ***The Jews’ victory caused 75,310 people (Esther 9:10, 15, 16). This corresponds with the enemy deaths in Ezekiel 38-39. ·          Esther 9:10 10 the ten sons of Haman son of Hammedatha, the enemy of the Jews. But they did not lay their hands on the plunder . ·          Esther 9:15-16 15 The Jews in Susa came together on the fourteenth day of the month of Adar, and they put to death in Susa three hundred men , but they did not lay their hands on the plunder . 16 Meanwhile, the remainder of the Jews who were in the king’s provinces also assembled to protect themselves and get relief from their enemies . They killed seventy-five thousand of them but did not lay their hands on the plunder. ·          Ezekiel 39:11 11 “‘On that day I will give Gog a burial place in Israel, ...
Read more

From Grave to Glory (G2G)-A Preterist Postmillennial Commentary-Revelation 12-22

Image
Revelation 12 V1-2: We see the same imagery of Joseph’s dream here in Genesis 37:9-11. Israel (representing Jerusalem as well in Matthew 2:18) is described as the Daughter of Zion-a dying mother; specifically, Rachel who died tragically during pregnancy. See Isaiah 50:1, 54:1-6, 66:7; Jeremiah 4:31; Micah 4:9-10; Galatians 4:27; Jeremiah 31:15; Matthew 2:18. Although Jerusalem will be destroyed, the remnant will represent a glimmer of hope similar to Benjamin and Christ's respective births. The woman clothed with the sun represents the exalted status of Israel among all nations. However, the moon is under her feet, which represents the waning status of the Old Covenant. The moon reflects light from the sun. The twelve stars represent the twelve tribes of Israel. The dying Daughter of Zion was about to give birth to Christ and the Church. V3: The Dragon’s seven heads have crowns at this time, which means the Roman Empire was in control. This represents Satan’s authority over the Rom...
Read more